Appeal Win for a Self-Build Home in South Norfolk

Overview

We are pleased to have secured a significant appeal decision for a self build in South Norfolk which was granted in a semi-rural location.

This success not only allowed the proposed development but also underscored that South Norfolk and Broadland councils are falling short of their self-build duties. This decision has far-reaching implications for landowners and developers pursuing self-build projects within Broadland/South Norfolk, and can also be applied nationally as most councils are failing to meet their targets based on the same principles set out within the appeal decision, which we can assess for each council.

The Proposal

The application involved the construction of a single new home located outside a settlement boundary with limited access to facilities and services. Despite these constraints, the appeal was successful, largely due to careful planning and a strong case highlighting the following factors:

1. Location and Principle of Development
   • While the site lay outside the settlement boundary, it was argued that the arrangement and siting of the proposed dwelling aligned with the existing development pattern.
   • The location promoted healthy living through access to abundant green spaces and open countryside.
2. Character and Appearance
   • The design was considered reasonable in scale, form, massing, and orientation, ensuring that the property was in keeping with the surrounding area.
   • The development did not negatively impact any conservation areas or listed assets nearby.
3. Self-Build Requirements
   • The self-build nature of the proposal supported the council’s self-build and custom-build housing targets of ensuring a mix of dwelling types.
   • Sustainable materials, electric vehicle charging provisions, and eco-conscious design further strengthened the case.

The South Norfolk District Council’s core strategy policies and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) adopt a nuanced approach to housing outside settlement boundaries. The policy does not strictly prohibit such developments but instead weighs their benefits against potential harm.

In this case, the lack of a five-year housing land supply (5YHLS) played a pivotal role. Previous appeals have demonstrated that councils with a shortfall in housing supply are more likely to approve reasonable and sustainable developments, even in semi-rural or remote locations.

Outcome and Implications

The Planning Inspectorate concluded that the proposal was an acceptable use of the land and that the positives of the development far outweighed any negatives. The decision demonstrates the importance of:

• Aligning developments with local and national planning policies.
• Highlighting sustainability and self-build contributions.
• Addressing housing supply shortfalls in planning applications.

Conclusion

This appeal decision sets a valuable precedent for individuals and developers looking to undertake self-build projects in South Norfolk and Broadland. If you are considering a similar project or have land that may be suitable for development, get in touch to explore your options.